Anyone interested in actual skepticism around the Cass review and not something that reads like a rejected Mashable article from some terminally online freak that thinks transgender people did not exist more than a few months ago, check out this article written by someone who is actually qualified: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)
Skeptic
1247 readers
2 users here now
A community for Scientific Skepticism:
Scientific skepticism or rational skepticism, sometimes referred to as skeptical inquiry, is a position in which one questions the veracity of claims lacking empirical evidence.
Do not confuse this with General Skepticism, Philosophical Skepticism, or Denialism.
Things we like:
- Civility
- Thoughtful discussion based on evidence and facts
- Humor
Things we don't like:
- Personal attacks or disrespectful attitude
- Wild speculation on events with no evidence
- Low-effort comments and posts
Other communities of interest:
"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." -David Hume
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"Cis-supremacy in the UK’s approach to healthcare"
Yes that sounds quite scientific doesn't it. Published a whole month before the Cass review was, brilliant prescience you must agree?
by someone who is actually qualified
An arts degree and a business doctorate do not a qualified person make.
Do you know how systematic reviews work?