this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
53 points (94.9% liked)

Selfhosted

38768 readers
162 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I am looking for an IP PoE camera. The thing is, it must work out of the box with something like ONVIF or at least give video stream right away.

I don't want to run any proprietary apps on my devices, including JavaScript web apps hosted by the camera.

Do you know of any that can be just plugged to the network (would run it on VLAN) and automagically appear on Home Assistant, iSpy or Frigate?

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I have reolink cameras and they were pretty plug n play.

HA picked up the reolinks once connected, but integration with frigate requires some setup. The frigate HA integration works very well.

Oh and for notifications to work well... Or how you expected to work. Having the mqtt server setup will help as well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ONVIF needs a user with username and password, you will need at least a web interface to add it to the camera. What's the problem with a web app hosted by the camera?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Reolink ist the way to go. I think only the battery powered ones don't have onvif. Otherwise the poe cameras all support onvif and are generally of very good quality. Plug it in and of you go. EDIT: Forgot to mention: You can configure the camera via the web interface, so no need for an app. I'm using the 820 at the moment, but I'm planning to get the new trackmix camera, these look really good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

None, at minimum you need to login to the web interface on the camera to set up a user/pass for ONVIF.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I use tp-link Tapo cameras and they work great! Yes you have to use there app to see them up the first time and provide username and pass for rtsp feed but after that toss them in your NVR software and boom good to go!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I did exactly this last year to monitor my cats at home while I was on holiday.

I bought two of these - REOLINK RLC-811A: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B09873G7X3

I assigned static IPs to both of these, and blocked all of their outgoing traffic to the public internet (in case Chairman Xi or Strongman Putin wants to also see what my cats are up to).

I then spun up a local motioneye container: https://github.com/motioneye-project/motioneye

The cameras by default (I think) provide rtsp streams, so I added the two streams (rtsp://somehostname.local:554/h265Preview_01_main) to motioneye and verified that I was able to view the camera streams on my local LAN.

The last step was simply to use cloudflare to as an authentication frontend to proxy my local motioneye container to my public domain name. Worked a treat!

Hope this helps, cheers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

(in case Chairman Xi or Strongman Putin wants to also see what my cats are up to).

😁

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

seems not much. for sure, you should avoid fosscam! pure shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I purchase cheap Anran branded IP cameras. So far they've been meh, but they don't require application to set up. They do support ONVIF but you have to configure it through web interface. For me that's good enough. Configure once, ban internet access since no Chinese stuff is ever getting access to internet from my network.

Whether they will work with mentioned software, I have no idea. I run my own form of software for security cameras by basically implementing FTP server, where most recent events are stored in Redis and hi resolution image is stored elsewhere on hard disk.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

None IIRC, are you not able to spin up a VM on the same VLAN as the cameras to set them up, and nuke the VM once setup complete?

You may have better luck setting up an airgapped NVR, using USB webcams instead, or just DIYing an IP camera using an SBC

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've been happy with the tp link TV-IP324PI, it's a Poe bullet cam with a simple web interface (I don't think it requires JS, but at any rate you just need to log in once to set a password, make sure upnp is off, and adjust camera/encoding/fps/text overlay settings to your liking). There's also the amcrest IP5M-B1186EW-28MM, another similar Poe bullet cam with night vision that works local only. I've used both for several years and I think they support onvif but I had no issues using the rtmp url with zoneminder

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Woth Hikvision you can do the setup of the camera (user,pass,stream settings etc) via a web UI. From there you can use those settings in a camera rtsp sensor in HA. Not sure if this is still not what you wanted. It supports ONVOF too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Hikvision also has some serious baggage from the Chinese govt. Hanwha is really good stuff, South Korean, a spin off from Samsung.

load more comments
view more: next ›