Motorsport.com revealed over the Hungarian Grand Prix weekend that the idea of introducing a mechanism to equalise power units among the manufacturers has been tabled by the FIA for discussion at this weekโs meeting of the F1 Commission. It is understood that the move has been prompted by concerns that the Renault engine, which is used by Alpine, has fallen behind rivals and could be as much as 30hp down on the best.
While not confirming any figures, Alpine team principal Otmar Szafnauer has admitted that the French manufacturer is adrift of the opposition โ which is hampering its competitive fortunes.
โAll the teams do the same analysis and the FIA does its analysis,โ he said when asked about how his engine stacked up against the opposition. โWe are significantly down.โ
Although teams do not normally like handing performance gains to rivals, the situation surrounding equalisation during a power unit freeze is a different matter.
With Renault unable to make any improvements to its power units because the current engines are homologated, the situation is slightly unfair to anyone who finds themselves behind.
That is why Red Bull boss Horner thinks that, if the FIA can show that there is disparity between the engines, then it is only right that moves are made to put everyone on a level playing field.
Asked by Motorsport.com what he thought about the engine equalisation situation, Horner said: โIt is about seeing what are the deficits. The FIA have all of the data and they should present exactly what the differences are.
โI think that would be fascinating for everybody to see, and I think that if there is a deficit under homologation, then it's something that we should be sensible about - otherwise, you're locked in for two years. I wouldn't be averse to a sensible discussion.โ
Horner has in the past made calls for equalisation in the early turbo hybrid years when faced with a Renault engine that was behind the benchmark power units of Mercedes and Ferrari.
Szafnauer has welcomed Hornerโs stance, especially because the engines were frozen from 2022 to 2025 as a means of helping Red Bull continue to use Honda engines in the wake of the Japanese manufacturerโs withdrawal from F1.
โI am glad Christian said that because, if you look back, the reason the engines were frozen was because Honda was pulling out at that time and Red Bull didnโt have an engine department to continue developing,โ he explained.
โThe reason we all agreed was for the benefit of Red Bull, so it is nice that Christian recognises that.
โAnd, at the time of the arrangement, there was also an agreement among the engine manufacturers that if anybody fell out by 1% then there would be good faith discussions to bring that parity back.โ
While F1โs power units have been frozen since the start of 2022, Szafnauer believes that the competitive picture has shifted since then as rivals have gained from making reliability upgrades.
โEverybody is allowed to fix their reliability issues and, hidden in reliability issues, can sometimes be power upgrades,โ he said. โIt depends on what reliability issue you are fixing.
โI remember in 2007 when we froze the V8s, I was the one who received every request from other teams for Honda. They came to me first, and all the requests back then were for cost-saving and reliability.
โIโd pass them on to the correct engineers. But there is a lot of stuff that can be disguised as reliability and then you increase the power.โ
Formula 1
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donโt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
Location | Date |
---|---|
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands | 23-25 Aug |
๐ฎ๐น Italy | 30 Aug-01 Sep |
๐ฆ๐ฟ Azerbaijan | 13-15 Sep |
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore | 20-22 Sep |
๐บ๐ธ United States | 18-20 Oct |
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico | 25-27 Oct |
๐ง๐ท Brazil | 01-03 Nov |
๐บ๐ธ United States | 21-23 Nov |
๐ถ๐ฆ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
๐ฆ๐ช Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
I'm so confused, I always assume Horner is double speaking and shit talking but I can't quite figure out the angle here. Is it: "Go ahead and equalise the engines and fight amongst yourselves we have aero advantage anyway"?
Engine equalisation would cut development costs massively, figuratively speaking in any technology 95% of the performance is achieved with 50% of the budget, so the big spends are always on the tiny things that keep you ahead of the competition, if everyone is equalised then there is no reason to waste money on developments that get the extra 2 or 3 HP from the system.
Pareto efficiency for the win?
This sounds so sensible that I am still shocked that Christian "It wasn't me" Horner has said it ๐.
I think Horner is for it because he knows it will harm the competitors more than Red Bull.
The other angle I haven't seen suggested here is that this is a forward-looking insurance play from Horner. At the moment RBPT are winning off the back of development work done by Honda in previous years. Nonetheless, they are new to the engine game and there is likely some substantial concern that when the next engine regs come they will be left floundering.
By backing the equalisation they give themselves precedent to demand the same again a few years down the line if RB engines fall behind the pack. They are likely very confident in the rest of their current package, to the point that they can risk making the current situation more competitive in order to guard against future disaster.
I don't especially like Horner, but I think it's hard to argue that he's anything but an excellent team principle, possibly the best on the grid. If he's doing this there is zero chance it's for altruistic reasons - there is a play for RB here somewhere, it's just a case of figuring out what it is.
This makes the most sense to me. Never trust Horner.
I can see a few reasons why I think red bull won't be against this.
- They believe they have the best drive on the grid. Put everyone in identical cars and Max still probably wins everything
- They believe their aero package is better than anyone else
- They were helped by a similar thing a few years ago when Honda was dropping engine manufacturing. Paying back the karma
- Helps keep costs down. Making an engine be as good as everyone else is significantly easier than making an engine better than everyone else. There becomes a point when it is exponentially harder to increase performance
because they don't really want to make engines and don't want a repeat of 2014 with the next engine regulation change.
If I'm not mistaken Red Bull will be making their own engines from either 2024 or 2026? I'm sure I read they they are building that facility now.
Maybe he's concerned that their first engine will be down on power compared to the rest, in which case equalising would benefit him.
yeah they are because they have to. I'm sure they would prefer not to.
equalise the engines and fight amongst yourselves we have aero advantage anyway
this is what it sounds like, Red Bull has Adrian Newey so might as well neutralize the engine advantage that Ferrari or Merc could possibly have
Of course Horner would back this lmao
Can someone post the article content plz?
I reckon there should be a rule where every team gets an Adrian Newey.