this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Java™ Community

476 readers
3 users here now

Write once, run anywhere (WORA)

Java is a high-level, class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.

The community

News, Technical discussions, research papers and assorted things of interest related to the Java Platform.

Rules
  1. Follow the Code of Conduct.
  2. Please make sure its a question/topic/post that would be new to most members. In Lemmy the publications are not closed, so you can continue to participate in them, regardless of the time they were published.
  3. Lemmy doesn’t have flags yet, so please tag your posts with [Question], [Help], [Learning], [JVM], [JSE], [OpenJDK], [Eclipse] or other you may think is appropriate.

Related communities

Resources

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What's the best way to help Lemmy users organise into productive communities?

On Reddit we have:

  • r/java - Java news and discussion. Not about learning the language or getting help with Java problems
  • r/learnjava - learning to use the Java language, platform, its tools, or parts of its ecosystem (libraries)
  • r/javahelp - Getting help with Java (in practice, much the same content as r/learnjava)

So far, on Lemmy I've found the following (with only the very start of an active membership building up in each)

Are there other communities out there already?

How do we avoid fragmentation? Where there's overlap, are there reasoned opinions on how to converge (eg matching instance policies to the audience)?

 

Do we just encourage communities to peer-link until critical mass develops and community activity-levels speak for themselves? Or is that just likely to split the community until community owners promote migration towards a 'common space' for each type of content?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe it's too early to tell them apart. maybe we need some time and some growth to see where it goes. ✌🏻

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm concerned that the lack of an effort to make similar communities visible will result in accidental cliques forming, not because the communities are meaningfully different, but because a large portion of their membership are oblivious to the existence of their peers.

Having separate groups, serving the same purpose surely doesn't benefit the participants. It may even turn users away, incorrectly communicating a lack of activity or misrepresenting the true number of like-minded participants.

The only way I can see to avoid this now, is to actively engage in peer-linking. The coalescing of redundant splits in communities can happen later (hopefully with some future assistance from the platform).