UK Nature and Environment

408 readers

70 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Much of England’s ‘national landscapes’ out of bounds, say campaigners (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

England’s most stunning “national landscapes” are largely out of bounds, and 22 of the 34 have less than 10% of their area open to the public, research has found.

The government last year renamed areas of outstanding natural beauty to national landscapes, and said part of their aim was to widen access to nature. Ministers said at the time the new name reflected a recognition that they are not just beautiful but important for many reasons including improving wellbeing.

The National Landscape Association, a government-organised body representing national landscapes and their conservation boards, advertise that “they are the UK’s nearby countryside – 66% of people in England (44 million) live within 30 minutes of a national landscape and at least 170 million people visit them every year”.

However, new research by the Right to Roam campaign has found that only a tiny fraction of most of these beautiful areas are freely accessible for walking and other forms of outdoor recreation.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] snota 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Even the areas where there are rights of way, private land owners make it as difficult as possible to follow them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There certainly are a good number - but not all - who do. It is counter productive though. If you can't easily follow the route, you are far more likely to end up wandering off it and ending up somewhere they don't want you and you don't want to be.

If they mark it clearly, everyone stays on it and there are no problems.

[–] snota 1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I was being a bit unfair and it seems to depend on location. And yes, make it clear and there won't be a problem, but having the problem to complain about gives them credence to the removal of public rights of way.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have a feeling that the reason these areas are still stunning, is because people have difficulty getting there.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 9 months ago

I want to go do doughnuts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

However, new research by the Right to Roam campaign has found that only a tiny fraction of most of these beautiful areas are freely accessible for walking and other forms of outdoor recreation.

Protesters will descend on Cirencester Park in the Cotswolds this weekend for a mass trespass after the owners started charging for entry to the green space.

She said: “Access to nature is vital for both our physical and mental health, so it is unhealthy, unfair and unacceptable that so much of the beautiful British countryside is off limits to the vast majority of people.

“Any government that was serious about improving our national health and wellbeing would act with urgency to ensure everyone has a legal and comprehensive right to roam and enjoy the natural world around us.”

Lewis Winks from the Right to Roam campaign added: “It’s startling that some of our most celebrated landscapes are largely out of bounds, yet this is simply illustrative of our broken access system in England.

“When our so-called ‘nearby countryside’ is inaccessible it acts as a pertinent reminder that access reform must go beyond being defined by land use, and instead focus on connectivity and clarity.

The original article contains 715 words, the summary contains 197 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!