It's frustrating that these things are not considered when picking a potential location for the farm. To be clear I'm not saying we should go ahead and build anyway; the ecological impact of these projects are just as important as their output, but if this is cancelled not only is it likely that it will never get relocated elsewhere, but it'll also be used as yet another reason why 'renewables = bad'. What a massive waste of funding and potential.
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
408 readers
61 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Unfortunately wind farms are always going to have an impact on nature. All major infrastructure projects do. The alternative of continuing to rely on fossil fuels is already having a way more damning impact on all wildlife.