UK Nature and Environment

408 readers

70 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Climate change experts have 'serious concerns' at tree planting cut (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Scottish government's climate change advisers have raised "serious concerns" about cuts to tree planting.

It was announced in December that the woodland creation budget was being slashed by 41% from £77.2m to £45.4m.

Ministers have admitted the cut means they will fall well short of next year's target of 18,000 hectares of new woodland to tackle climate change.

The Scottish government has blamed the decision on cuts to the block grant from Westminster.

The forestry sector said the decision will mean millions of small trees which have been growing in nurseries ready for planting will have to be destroyed.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] YungOnions 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

'The forestry sector said the decision will mean millions of small trees which have been growing in nurseries ready for planting will have to be destroyed.'

This seems needlessly wasteful. Surely if they're going to be destroyed anyway you could give them away for free? There must be tree planting charities that could take advantage of a least some of these?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yes, that was my first thought. There has to some potential for that.

[–] snota 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It depends in the value of the tree vs the cost to plant it. If the shortfall in funding mostly covers the cost to pay people to plant the trees then the charities will have to make up the shortfall in time or donations which may be impossible.

[–] YungOnions 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

True enough. You're more than likely correct, it's still frustrating though.

[–] snota 1 points 9 months ago

Absolutely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Ministers have admitted the cut means they will fall well short of next year's target of 18,000 hectares of new woodland to tackle climate change.

In response to the letter, CCC chief executive Chris Stark said any delay in tree planting would risk not achieving the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions which are required to meet targets in the 2030s and beyond.

He added that the budget cuts "represent a continued gap in Scotland meeting its tree planting ambition" and that the committee has "serious concerns" about the plans.

He added: "It is vital that in the coming weeks, Scotland's government listens to the CCC and works with Confor and the Woodland Trust to find a funding solution."

Opposition parties have condemned the cuts to the woodland creation budget with the Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie submitting a motion urging a rethink.

"I would welcome the committee's support in seeking further funding from the UK government so that we can all get more trees in the ground and tackle climate change and nature loss."

The original article contains 504 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!