this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

2400 readers
427 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For weeks, more than half a million Anthem Blue Cross enrollees who receive health care from the University of California were held in suspense. It wasn’t clear whether they would have to find new doctors or switch plans as the health system and one of its largest insurance partners struggled to reach agreement on a new contract.

UC Health accused Anthem of not negotiating in good faith, while Anthem leaders retorted that UC Health had demanded too much and rebuffed the insurer’s request for administrative efficiencies. In fact, roughly 8 million Anthem members in California were at risk of losing in-network access to UC Health’s vast network of prestigious hospitals and medical facilities, which could have left them with much higher out-of-pocket expenses. While not all patients were made aware of the situation, Anthem notified some enrollees they would be reassigned to new primary care doctors if no deal were reached.

But even as the parties announced an eleventh-hour agreement on Feb. 5, industry analysts say the conflict has become part of a trend in which patients are increasingly caught in the crossfire of contract disputes. Amid negotiations over rising labor and equipment costs, it’s often patients who are ultimately saddled with higher bills as the health industry continues to consolidate.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tremble 5 points 10 months ago

Face off between the health system and unnecessary middle men. Fuck insurance companies. They are completely unneeded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

We had this same thing to start the year. There’s one health system in our rural area. Last fall they notified us they might not be in-network for our insurance starting Jan. 1 because of failed contract negotiations. If they hadn’t reached an agreement the nearest in-network hospital or clinic would’ve been a 90 minute drive one way.

I guess as a plus to this situation I did find out (through my own research) our state has laws setting a maximum distance we have to travel to reach in-network care. If the nearest one is further than that maximum we can go to a closer medical center and the insurance company is supposed to only charge us the in-network rate. But I definitely wasn’t looking forward to trying to get through all the red tape to actually get the price adjusted.