this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
42 points (97.7% liked)

Public Health

360 readers
1 users here now

For issues concerning:


๐Ÿฉบ This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])


Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I hate to be that person, but cancer vaccines have existed for a couple of decades now (not to mention "cancer" is a whole list of different conditions that don't have a singular solution and will never have a single vaccine).

This might be the first of its kind, and it's still great news and I hope it passes trials, but I'm just so sick of these click-baity headlines.. (Also Tory-graph use a subscribe-wall, so even if you do click, you can't read what cancer it will be targeting)

(this is nothing against OP, just the article)

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thanks! My first thought was "hey, what about HPV?"

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Exactly. I went to double check how long it's been around before posting, and wiki tells me that wasn't even the first.

This is good news regardless, worth celebrating for what it is, why they have to make shit up to catch attention (for profit) is just so frustrating..