this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Anti-censorship

186 readers
1 users here now

Censorship is bad, and is often difficult to seek accountability for (because such attempts are themselves censored).

This community exists as a safe place to report on instances and patterns of censorship among pro-GME, pro-DRS, and financial transparency accounts/content.

RULE: Due to the unfortunate risk of escalating tensions, please limit content in this community to factual record. Please do not include commentary on presumed motivations, intentions, shillery, name-calling, etc. If such commentary is included in screenshots, it must be redacted out.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As a reminder, please limit content in this community to factual record. Please do not include commentary on presumed motivations, intentions, shillery, name-calling, etc. Thanks for keeping tensions to a minimum! (Especially with our always fair and steady-handed friend, the federal government ๐Ÿ˜ฌ๏ธ)

Auto-crosspost: https://lemmy.whynotdrs.org/post/22100

Original: https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/153zf5r/sec_currently_deleting_comments_on_proposal/

A short sample of the removed comments still visible in the index:

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems like this was a bit premature. The comments are still there as of now. https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-32-10/s73210.htm

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Some of the comments go to a 404 page