this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
-29 points (19.1% liked)

Conservative

479 readers
127 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
 

150 Democrats voted against the bill

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's interesting that in the example given of the illegal who drunkenly caused a crash and killed 2 people had already been deported four times. So why act like deporting him again is a real solution?

It is essentially saying: what we have been doing hasn't worked, so let's do it harder! Democrats obviously don't think drunk driving is a crime since they won't vote for a measure that doesn't actually solve anything!

And why drunk driving specifically? I mean don't get me wrong we all know drunk driving is bad no matter who does it, but wouldn't it make more sense if an undocumented person commits any crime under US law there should be some consequence? It shouldn't matter if any undocumented person, applying for asylum or not, steals mail or violates the securities act of 1933. They should be kicked out.

Let's be real about this: deportation is obviously not the whole answer. Still, republicans refuse to cooperate on comprehensive border and immigration reform simply because they don't want the current president to get credit for anything during an election year - all the while crying about a crisis at the border.

Further, 33 out of 35 of Trump's immigration agency actions either got ruled against in court or the agency withdrew them when they got sued, because they knew damn well they couldn't win. So it's not like we can even go back to those policies, because they aren't legal.

TLDR: this is just more political theatre.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, commit a crime, get thrown out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DUI? driving under influence?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Yes. Apparently it wasn't an automatic deportation before, and 150 democrats think it shouldn't be.