this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
151 points (99.3% liked)

Denver Post Comment Section

305 readers
8 users here now

A place for ex-pats from the Denver Post comment section (closing down in July), as well as people that want to discuss Denver Post articles in general.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
151
Opinion: Clarence Thomas can’t be impartial in Trump’s eligibility case. Per the new Supreme Court code, he must recuse himself. (www.denverpost.com)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 months ago

Of course he MUST based on things like decency, precedent, and fairness.

But does he HAVE to? Current year feels it's unlikely.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

Coke Can Clarence should have never been put into that office in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Lol who enforces the code? Because the other justices are 5-3. Call me crazy but I have a feeling they won't want to set a precedent.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Can Roberts force him? Would Roberts even try?

Sure seems like the Thomas court these days.