this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
-34 points (9.5% liked)

Conservative

479 readers
127 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
 

Rewrote headline to be less clickbaity

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh. It wouldn't surprise me that there are some shady characters or volunteers in the "United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East". There is bound to be. It also wouldn't surprise me if this was just a blatant lie or misinformation from the US or Israel. Both have a solid track record of lying, like pretty much every government. I also assume they won't produce any proof and this would be rather impossible to investigate independently. So basically this tells me nothing.

[–] MomoTimeToDie -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Funny how you're quick to assume everyone who doesn't support your favorite terrorists must just be lying

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I said could be lying. Don't strawman me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good thing you fixed the title. The article certainly isn't ideologically motivated at all. /s

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

It was the only article I found in my google search that actually covered the story.