this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

AskHistorians

3 readers
0 users here now

AskHistorians is currently operated in Restricted Mode. No questions are currently being submitted, but we will be hosting periodic Floating...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
Did the victorious side actively seek to eliminate enemy soldiers even after securing a victory in ancient battles? (zerobytes.monster)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
0 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
This is an automated archive.

The original was posted on /r/askhistorians by /u/rymder on 2024-01-24 12:43:37+00:00.

When reading about historical battles, it seems that the winning side often aimed to maximize casualties among the defeated, as exemplified by the Carthaginians at the Battle of Cannae.

In instances where the defeated side wasn't surrounded and attempted to retreat, was it customary for the victors to pursue them? Was killing preferred over ransoming prisoners, and were there strategic advantages associated with this choice? Furthermore, did these practices undergo significant changes during the Middle Ages and beyond?

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here