this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
-3 points (43.5% liked)

Conservative

479 readers
144 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
all 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"It’s of no operational or law enforcement benefit to try to block federal authorities from being able to do their job," a senior official said., adding that the tactic has no impact on the migrant flow, and now that when Texas is done receiving them they still are turned over at other locations – therefore adding extra steps to the process.

So it's pretty much performative. Interesting that it's an "senior official" that said that, who maybe wanted to remain unnamed perhaps to avoid an avalanche of death threats, bomb threats, and other vitriolic hate.

[–] MomoTimeToDie 1 points 1 year ago

perhaps to avoid an avalanche of death threats, bomb threats, and other vitriolic hate.

More like he's too much of a coward to stand behind his obvious bullshit