Going out on a limb here… we don’t tolerate it. There isn’t much stopping them though, esp with a stacked SCOTUS and GQP.
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
288 points (96.5% liked)
politics
19248 readers
1859 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Naaah we tolerate it. Remember when Reagan sold arms to the country that held American hostages during his predecessor's term. You know the country he illegally colluded with to beat the incumbent president. Selling them weapons to circumvent a US embargo. To fund international terrorism like the contras in South America. And then when he and his VP were caught red handed. They passed it off to a patsy. Ollie North! The criminal president at his term limit retiring comfortably as Republican Messiah. The criminal VP going on to be president. Who then pardoned the former president and Ollie North of their crimes. And America collectively yawned. So much so that cartoons do a better job covering it than most history books people are exposed to.
Sorry. I’m still not tolerating corrupt governing. If you do, that’s okay.
Nowhere did I ever say I tolerated it. I'm just asking who this We is you think you're talking about. Because America clearly tolerates it.
like weeds in your garden, corruption breeds more corruption.. Trump spread weeds everywhere he went..
Johnny Knotweed Seed.
Donny Nettleseed
America was already tolerating a ton of corruption, though, just much less brazen.
Basically, bribing a politicians is completely legal as long as you don't tell the world what you're bribing them to do.
Blackmailing them with threats of supporting their opponents if they don't say or do what you want is completely fine too, apparently.
The trick is to not be too blatant about it, brag about it, deny it and then brag about it some more like the Mango Mussolini does.
Yeah. Every single time there's an op-ed accusing Trump of inventing something, inevitably it's just something he exploited and dialed up to 11. The only people more confident of Trump's abilities than his supporters are his detractors.
Yeah. He's an especially malignant tumor, not the underlying cancer.
“It’S not bribEry It’S LObbyiNG!!“
You mean he taught the "liberal media" and the cons this. Normal people hate this brazen corruption and want to see it severely punished.
Liberal media... Like the website this article is hosted on? Or CNN covering it regularly? Reuters?
How would you define liberal media?
It's in quotation marks, it's most likely tongue in cheek.
I was about to say Whoosh... but I don't get the first sentence then. Liberal media as in Fox News since even that's liberal to MAGA now? Cons being conservatives yeah?
I think so lol
imagine getting it this backwards. The reason they tolerate trump's corruption is because most of congress is nearly as bad and any sort of digging would create a weapon that could be used against them.
This is not true. I'm not denying widespread corruption and in Congress (much of it even legal) , but Trump's corruption was more widespread and more brazenly public than any US politician in living memory.
Every single he went golfing at a golf course he owns and forced the secret service to rent out dozens of rooms at the attached hotel he owns, it was an act of corruption. He did it so many times that people just forget it. It slipped into the background of his other schemes. But it was nonetheless corruption every single time. He openly used the office to enrich himself. Not with deals, not by subtly having favourable classes added to legislation. He did it directly and openly.
there have been numerous rulings by SCOTUS going back before the 80s each making it harder to prosecute politicians for corruption, with citizens united being one of the largest barriers between corporations and state removed.
Realistically trump isn't some anomoly - He's just a donor class person entering in the building from the back door the politicians leave from. The fact that door exists between politicians and donors is the problem here. Trump just did it much more blatantly but its still the same problem that Manchin or whoever have where they favor their own companies with legislative carvouts or cushy appointments.
When there’s so much trash keeps piling up in your room with no idea which way is up or down anymore, your brain just kinda begins to accept it for what it is and goes with the flow.