this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

SkincareAddiction

885 readers
8 users here now

A lemmy community for skincare enthusiasts.

Some ground-rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But that’s why it’s so nice that there are some gems who actually have scientifically backed formulations, or even better: contribute to science by doing studies and creating new categories!

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

P&G does some interesting anti-aging research involving genetics. I saw a talk about it some years ago when I was in chemistry graduate school.

SK-II is therefore probably legit but it's too expensive for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

you just sent me down a 30 min google spiral hahah, thank you for the tip!

[–] Alanjaow 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Aren't the majority of skin care things (and makeup) tested on animals though?

[–] Chais 5 points 1 year ago

In regards to safety, yes. They have to make sure you don't develop a rash or something. Good thing there are regulations for that, otherwise at least some companies would try without that, too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i mean if it is required for safety reasons then that's okay imo

[–] EdanGrey 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not required though, many companies do just fine without the testing on animals while still being compliant.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Often those companies just use ingredients and formulations that have been tested on animals by other companies and the patent has run out/it is not patented. Companies doing animal testing probably would not do animal testing on such products too. Most companies try to avoid costs.