Nintendo

19018 readers

10 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

No NSFW content.
No hate speech or personal attacks.
No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
No console wars or PC elitism.
Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20 [Switch 2 Direct] | Apr 02 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

40 Years Later, Nintendo's Famicom Is Still Ahead Of Its Time (www.gameinformer.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] otp 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An interesting article, but something ahead of its time will continue to be ahead of its time no matter how many years pass

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Someone could have changed their mind on whether or not something was ahead of it's time.

40 years later, and I still haven't changed my mind that Nintendo's Famicom...

There, I fixed the title.

[–] otp 4 points 1 year ago

That's fair!

I guess there'd be times when the opinion changes. Like maybe the original iPhone seemed ahead of its time, but nowadays it's recognized that it wasn't the first for any of its features, just the right combination at the right time.

[+] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] zzzzz 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You haven't understood. OP is saying that something being ahead of its time isn't a function of how much time has passed since. It will always remain ahead of its time. As stated, it is an intrinsic, rather than an extrinsic, property.

See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrinsic_and_extrinsic_properties

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I agree, and especially in this case, but I can think of corner cases where "its time" gets fuzzier as time passes and expands to include more competition.

For example, the Compaq Presario 2100 seems to have been about the first PC with a price under USD$1000 - I remember that being a big deal at the time! ... for a few months. Now it's just a footnote that took me some Google-fu to find at all, but it was ahead of its time at the time and was a cover story on magazines.

[–] Kecessa 9 points 1 year ago

Something being ahead of its time is ahead compared to its contemporaries. 100 years later its contemporaries are still the same because being contemporary of something means "being of the same period", therefore no matter how much time passes, it will still be ahead of its time.

[–] otp 3 points 1 year ago

Something can be ahead of its time, but that doesn't mean it is unsurpassable.

I wasn't saying it was unsurpassable. I was saying that "its time" was a fixed point in history, and if it was ahead of its time (aka. 1983), it will always be ahead of its time (1983).

The Famicom is definitely not ahead of the Switch, or even the N64. I'm sure someone could argue it was ahead of the SNES in some ways. Or anything else. But as a whole, it's been surpassed a long time ago.