this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
92 points (93.4% liked)

Selfhosted

40394 readers
454 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

A reverse proxy takes all your web-based services, e.g.

  • plex on port 32400
  • octoprint on port 8000
  • transmission on port 8888

and allows you to map these to domain names, so instead of typing server.example.com:32400 you can type plex.example.com. I have simplified this quite a bit though - you need DNS configured as well, and depending on your requirements you may want to purchase a domain name if you intend on accessing content from outside your home without a self hosted VPN.

Cloudflare is a DDoS mitigation service, a caching web proxy, and a DNS nameserver. Most users here would probably be using it for Dynamic DNS. You can use it in combination with a reverse proxy as a means to mask your home IP address from people connecting to your self hosted web-based services remotely, but on its own it cannot be used as a reverse proxy (at least easily - would not recommend attempting to). Do note that Cloudflare can see all the data you transmit through their systems, something to bare in mind if you are privacy conscious.

In my opinion though, it would be much better for you to use a self hosted VPN to access your self hosted services (can be used in combination with the reverse proxy), unless there is a specific need to expose the services out to the internet

Edit: fix minor typo, add extra info about cloudflare

[–] BluePhoenix01 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Very good points all around.

So far, I have WireGuard set up, and activate it when I need access.

This year I have considered Cloudflare tunnels to enable them only to issue SSL certificates (instead of signing my own like I did last year). But not sure if it is worth it or if I should just keep signing myself.

(Cert is mainly to avoid SSL warnings on iOS and browsers, so far I am the only one using what I host)

Might also be nice to not have to configure each device to use a different dns server (my own), but not sure the benefit is worth having that dns record “out there” and Cloudflare “in here”.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The DNS-01 challenge [1] allows for issuing SSL certificates without a publicly routable IP address. It needs API support from your DNS provider to automate it, but e.g. lego [2] supports many services.

I personally leave my Wireguard VPN always on, but as its only routing the local subnet with my services, it doesn't even appear in my battery statistics.

[1] https://letsencrypt.org/docs/challenge-types/#dns-01-challenge

[2] https://github.com/go-acme/lego

[–] BluePhoenix01 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the info and the links. That seems like a more sensible approach. Hope to try it out after the work week is done.

[–] arudesalad 3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

So a reverse proxy is a way to manage subdomains? I read somewhere that it allows multiple different services to be hosted on the same port and I think I know that that is probably a lie.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

That's halfway correct - I'll try and break it down a bit further into the various parts.

Your subdomains are managed in using DNS - if you want to create or change a subdomain, that happens here. For each of your services, you'll create a type of DNS entry called an "A record", containing your service's full domain name, and the IP address of your reverse proxy (in this example, it is 10.0.0.1)

The DNS records would look like the following:

  • plex.example.com, 10.0.0.1
  • octoprint.example.com, 10.0.0.1
  • transmission.example.com, 10.0.0.1

With these records created, typing any of these domains in a browser on your network will connect to your reverse proxy on port 80 (assuming we are not using HTTPS here). Your reverse proxy now needs to be set up to know how to respond to these requests coming in to the same port.

In the reverse proxy config, we tell it where the services are running and what port they're running on:

  • plex.example.com is at server.example.com:32400
  • octoprint.example.com is at server.example.com:8000
  • transmission.example.com is at server.example.com:8888

Now when you type the domain names in the browser, your browser looks in DNS for the "A record" we created, and using the IP in that record it will then connect to the reverse proxy 10.0.0.1 at port 80. The reverse proxy looks at the domain name, and then connects you on to that service.

What we've done here is taken all 3 of those web-based services, and put them onto a the same port, 80, using the reverse proxy. As long as the reverse proxy sees a domain name it recognises from its config, it will know what service you want.

One thing to note though, reverse proxies only work with web-based services

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Depends what you mean by same port. A reverse proxy would allow you to expose everything over 443 and then the proxy would route to particular app ports and hosts.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Accessed from the same port.

Each service runs/listens on its own port, including the proxy (typically 80/443). When you connect to the proxy using its port, it will look at the domain name you used and proxy your connection to the port for the service that name is setup for.

So when you go to expose these to the network/internet, you only have to expose the port the proxy listens to and the clients only ever use that port regardless of how many services/domains you host.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Edit: whoops, got a little bit sidetracked and didn't talk about cloudflare at all. I'll leave it up nonetheless as it contains info.

The reverse proxy only listens on port 80 and 443, so yes, all your services will be accessible through just one/two ports.

The reverse proxy will parse the http request headers and ask the appropriate upstream service (e.g. jellyfin) on localhost:12345 what it should send as a reply. Yes, this means that you need to have a http header so that the reverse proxy can differentiate the services. You don't need to buy a domain for that, you can use iPhone to make your made up domain map to a local IP address, but you need to call the reverse proxy as sub.domain.com. 192.168.0.123:80 won't work, because the proxy has no idea which service you want to reach.

I found it really easy to set up with docker compose and caddy as a reverse proxy. Docker services on the same network automatically resolve their names so the configuration file for caddy (the reverse proxy) is literally just sub.mydomain.com { reverse_proxy jellyfin:12345 }. This will expose the jellyfin docker, which is listening on port 12345, as sub.mydomain.com on port 80.

[–] arudesalad 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Also, could a reverse proxy be used to give cloudflare's services to a port they don't support?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes, typically the proxy will listen on 443/80 and all the services it proxies to just use their defaults.

For example: emby.example.tld, port 443 > cloudflare, port 443 > your reverse proxy, port 443 > emby, port 8096

All the client sees is emby.example.tld on port 443 and the resulting web application, everything in between is transparent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Another user already gave you the answer, but one thing to bear in mind is that Cloudflare only “speak” HTTP(S), and nothing else. So if for example you want to run Minecraft, CloudFlare’s free plan will not allow you to route it through port 80/443 as they don’t know how to “speak” the Minecraft protocol.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

I use it to manage my subdomains, something like notes.mywebsite.com would point at my trillium instance while photos.mywebsite.com would point at my my immich container it has more uses but that's my extent. I just have an instance of a cloud flare dns updater keeping my domain in sync with my ip so I don't have to do that manually when it changes.

So in my scenario cloud flare is just part of my setup.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:

Fewer Letters More Letters
DNS Domain Name Service/System
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
HTTPS HTTP over SSL
IP Internet Protocol
SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
VPN Virtual Private Network
VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)

7 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 5 acronyms.

[Thread #386 for this sub, first seen 30th Dec 2023, 00:05] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

This is an amazing idea for a bit and I really appreciate whoever made it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

CloudFlare is a good place for beginners to start. Setting up a reverse proxy can be daunting the first time. Certainly better than no reverse proxy.

That being said, having your own reverse proxy is nice. Better security since the certificates are controlled by your server. Also complex stuff becomes possible.

My traefik uses keys encrypt wild card domains to provide HTTPS for internal LAN only applications (vault warden) while providing external access for other things like seafile.

I also use traefik with authentik for single sign on. Traefik allows me to secure apps like sonarr with single sign on from my authentik setup. So I login once on my browser and I can access many of my apps without any further passwords.

Authentik also allows oAuth so I can use that for seafile, freshrss and immich. Authentik allows jellyfin login with LDAP. (This last paragraph could be setup with CloudFlare as well).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This is the way. My setup is very similar except I only use authentik for Nextcloud. I don't expose my "arr" services to the Internet so I don't feel it necessary to put them behind authentik, although I could if I wanted.

Using Duo's free 10 personal licenses is also great as it can also plug into authentik for MFA through the solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The primary reason to put authentik in front of arrs is so I don't have to keep putting in different password for each when logging in. I disable the authentication for each of them in the app itself and then disable the exposed docker port as well so the only way to access it it via traefik + authentik. It has local access only so isn't directly exposed to the internet.

10 free accounts on duo is very nice but I hate being locked into things (not self hosted). An open source or self hosted alternative to duo would be great.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How do you get certs for internal applications?

I use caddy and it does everything for me, but my limited understanding is that the dns entry for which the certs are requested must point to the ip address at which caddy is listening. So if I have a DNS entry like internal.domain.com which resolves to 10.0.0.123 and caddy is listening on that address I can get a http connection, but not an https connection, because letsencrypt can't verify that 10.0.0.123 is actually under my control.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is an alternate verification method using an API key to your DNS provider, if it's a supported one. That method doesn't need any IP to be assigned (doesn't care if there are A/AAAA records or where they point because it can verify the domain directly).

deSEC.io is a good example of a good, reputable and free DNS provider that additionally allows you to manage API keys. The catch is that they require you to enable DNSSEC (their mission is similar to Let's Encrypt, but for DNS).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, good to know. I'll see if can set that up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

I see that you want to use the cert for intranet apps btw.

What I did was get two LE wildcard certs, one for *.my.dom and one for *.local.my.dom. Both of them can be obtained and renewed with the API approach without any further care to what they actually point at.

Also, by using wildcards, you don't give away any of your subdomains. LE requests are public so if you get a cert for a specific subdomain everybody will know about it. local.my.dom will be known but since that's only used on my LAN it doesn't matter.

Then what I do for externally exposed apps is to point my.dom to an IP (A record) and either make a wildcard CNAME for everything *.my.dom to my.dom, or explicit subdomain CNAME's as needed, also to my.dom.

This way you only have one record to update for the IP and everything else will pick it up. I prefer the second approach and I use a cryptic subdomain name (ie. don't use jellyfin.my.dom) so I cut down on brute force guessing.

The IP points at my router, which forwards 443 (or a different port of you prefer) to a reverse proxy that uses the *.my.dom LE cert. If whatever tries to access the port doesn't provide the correct full domain name they get an error from the proxy.

For the internal stuff I use dnsmasq which has a feature that will override all DNS resolves for anything ending with .local.my.dom to the LAN IP of the reverse proxy. Which uses the *.local.my.dom LE cert for these ones but otherwise works the same.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You are completely correct...for normal certs. Internal domains require a wild card cert with DNS challenge.

This video explains how to set it up with traefik

https://youtu.be/liV3c9m_OX8

I'd bet caddy can do something similar.

Basically you have:

  1. Seafile.domain.com -> has it's own cert
  2. *.local.domain.com -> has its own cert but the * can be anything and the same cert can be used for anything in place of the star as many times as you want and therefore doesn't need to be internet accessible to verify. That way vaultwarden.local.domain.com remains local only.
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Historically, reverse proxies were invented to manage a large number of slow connections to application servers which were relatively resource intensive. If your application requires N bytes of memory per transaction then the time between the request coming in and the response going out could pin those bytes in memory, as the web server can't move ahead to the next request until the client confirms it got the whole page.

A reverse proxy can spool in requests from slow clients, when they are complete, then hand them off to the app servers on the backend, the response is generated and sent to the reverse proxy, which can slowly spool the response data out while the app server moves onto the next request.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

@jayrhacker @arudesalad This is exactly the behaviour that made nginx's reactor pattern implementation apt, with the side effect of accidentally making an extremely performant HTTP server in the process.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you're asking this you should probably use one to be more safe if you're exposing stuff to the web, there are other ways of doing it including just VPNing into your home network or using a VPS or cloudflare tunnels, but using a reverse proxy manager in combo with cloudflare DNS is a good place to start and is probably good enough if you use good enough security with it: long unique passwords, two factor, security keys, etc.

[–] knobbysideup 2 points 11 months ago

Other than waf stuff, if you have multiple servers behind a small nat, a reverse proxy can service them all from a single exposed public address. You can also do rewrite rules on the proxy vs on each server.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

The benefit is you can only open up 80/443, rather than a port per service/app.