I do think it's reasonable to pass on penalties to parents up until they are 13, even if they just force counseling on the first offense.
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)
Melbourne
1871 readers
56 users here now
This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.
The focus of our discussions is based around things that affect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.
Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)
Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Kids that are out doing things like that don't come from loving stable homes. Most of the time DHS are involved already. Criminal activities with kids that young are really a symptom of kids being raised in shitty situations - and eventually those broken homes lead to broken children that often grow up to be shitty adults.
The big problem is that we don't put money into services like child protection that can do something to mitigate the problems before they spiral out of control. It works out cheaper in the long term than funding the criminal system later, but for some reason our society hates spending money on things seen as "welfare" but is happy to fork out for punishment.
Punishment get votes, welfare doesn't. It's a simple as that.
When's the last time a politician ran on the platform 'More money for services' instead of 'Tough of crime'.
People vote with their hearts not their brains.
Even more fun when paired with this: Staff at Victoria's Malmsbury Youth Justice Centre told facility will close by end of the year