this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
349 points (99.7% liked)

196

16087 readers
1971 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is not Sisyphus, it is Sisyphus' shadow on the wall of the cavern

[–] kakes 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's actually Sisyphus' Monster.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It was Dr Sisyphus who was the monster

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hilbert's Grand Hotel can absolutely hold Sysiphus and his boulder, just move everyone two rooms up.

Theseus' ship is only paradoxical on the faulty premise that the ship existed in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hilbert's Grand Hotel can manage an infinite number of boulders, each containing an infinite number of Sisyphuses (Sisyphi? Sisyphes? Sisyphodes?) by designating each boulder a prime number and each Sisyphus a counting number, and multiplying the two to get their room number.

This leaves some rooms open for additional guests, which may get management angry about underutilized rooms. There are other configurations that pack everyone in more tightly.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

His happiness depends on whether or not a radioactive substance in a box has decayed, which has a 50% chance. But since it has not been observed, he is in a superposition of happy and unhappy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna need more weed, please.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Personally I'd love to be the subject of a philosophical problem so I'd say he's probably pretty stoked

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Oh, c'mon, obviously the answer is 42.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"the ultimate answer to life, the universe, and everything is… 42!"

there is no reason to assume this is not relevant for this case too

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'd imagine so