this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
54 points (98.2% liked)

NZ Politics

559 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The party of choice is going to force people to have to drive to get around by ensuring there are no viable alternatives. Worst government in a generation by far.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I think that Simeon Brown's religious fundamentalism doesn't get anywhere near enough oxygen. His past political action suggests he is anti-gay rights, anti-trans rights, anti bodily autonomy for women.

I think of him a lot more like the cynical culture wars politicians in the US. He's clearly got a brain given he was able to complete a law & commerce degree, but I think he attacks stuff like cycling & walking purely for political theatre.

If my opinion is right, that kind of cynicism is dangerous, it means anything is fair game purely for his personal benefit in terms of gaining & entrenching political power. Burn the planet, so long as he's a Minister.

And given his religious views, I can't help but wonder exactly what he wants that political power for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Billions in tax breaks and handouts to landlords and the well off, plum contracts for road builders, gutting rail for the benefit of trucking companies, refusing to even think about regulating or breaking up our monopolies, duopoliesand oligopolies present in nearly every single industry in NZ.

So this kinda fits with the MO - the goal isn't to provide the most efficient services to the public, its actually the opposite - insert yourselves between products, services because that inefficiency creates an opportunity to extract additional value from the public they could otherwise keep for themselves.

So I'd say yeah, it's mostly just greed and selfishness driving it. Culture wars stuff is mostly a distraction to hide the grift, however I do think there's something more sinister to it, that if people are free to express different gender, sexual and racial identities, what's to stop them getting uppity ideas about class and societal hierarchies being equally challengable?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This government is depressing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Come see the violence inherit on the system! Help help I'm being depressed!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

The party of their choice.

If you choose differently you're wrong.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"The reality is we are spending $17 million on a project to reduce emissions and there's not one single report showing that it will actually reduce emissions."

Kinda a big oversight, when you think about it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Kinda a big oversight when a quick web search returns this article from NZ Herald:

Study finds cycle lanes and walkways reduce car use and emissions

[–] [email protected] -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For this specific project though?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

It's funny how cycleway skeptics demand this endless justification for each individual project, despite the huge body of research already confirming their effect, then immediately turn around and moan about the money spent on reports instead of infrastucture.

And by funny I mean a painfully obvious tactic to just delay and wreck things.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Yes, anti cycleway people would never misrepresent a project