It's relevant, as all the shenanigans that disrupt business in the House are. It's not just gossip.
this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
-10 points (32.1% liked)
Conservative
481 readers
189 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
You're right. I shouldn't call it gossip. Maybe "politician misdeeds" would have been better.
And he was caught on video doing it too, so it's not like a normal "An anonymous source claims" story.
I kinda dont like the celebrity gossip articles, but lets see what the people want.
Fuck that, should be ejected.
What kind of childish bullshit is this, pulling a fire alarm.
Fuck him. Fire him. Whenever his name come up call him Fire Alarm Bowman.
Us minions would get a hefty fine, if not jail time for shit like this.
He was endangering hundreds of people. Fire alarm could have caused a panicked rush for the exits and there's a reasonable expectation that he knew that. I don't care what his politics are, he should be censured at the least. He shouldn't lose his job, though. Maybe he could do some community service instead, like a 2 a.m. walk for a week with the security staff, so he can see what they have to tolerate.
He shouldn't lose his job, though.
Why? Congress already decided that it was perfectly acceptable to just kick out people they don't like. Why not kick out someone who's actually a problem?