Isn't the Tesla version missing key features that other port styles have?
this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
Electric Cars
652 readers
1 users here now
Discussion of EVs and the technology around them
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Nothing too critical to North America. NACS doesn’t support 3 phase (but neither does J-1772).
Tesla superchargers are currently limited to 400V, but that isn’t a limit of NACS or the handles themselves, more a reflection of Tesla not needing more than 400V so far. V4 superchargers are supposed to be able to do 1000V and the NACS spec is for 500 or 1000V.
As the owner of a CCS-ported car, I'm ok with this.
One standard, down from three options, seems right. Imagine having to worry about which shape of the filler nozzle at a gas station...
It will be nice to be able to use the rows and rows of vacant superchargers here in Atlantic Canada. The CCS chargers are too-often a gamble (or non-existent).
With GM now on board I'm pretty sure this will cause a ripple effect and more automakers will join. Some sooner than others. The supercharger network has proven to be reliable for Teslas. I think it's a good thing all around. However, we won't truly know how well Ford and GM vehicles will integrate with superchargers until owners pull up and plug in. I have my fingers crossed that Volvo/Polestar is next!