Conservative

First, let me say I find it telling that you need to go as far back as 1972 - !51 YEARS AGO! - to find a place you feel safe arguing from.

in 1972 Gazans could freely travel into Israel

So they cannot now, by your own admission, or you would not have brought it up.

Therefore secondly, thankyou for admitting that Isreals treatment of Palestinians does rise to the level of Apartheid; of course, restricting the movement of a people based on their ethnic background is a form of racial descrimination as defined by the UN and various international human rights organisations.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-convention-elimination-all-forms-racial

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/apartheid#

So we have established that you are aware of and are currently trying to excuse apartheid, we are just haggling over where and at what point you think the actions of a few people justify the racial segregation of an entire ethnic group.

In regards the 1972 Munich Massacre, committed by the Black September organisation on German soil, I fail to see the direct link between the actions of a terrorist organisation in Germany as it relates to the justification of apartheid and mass mistreatment of the populace of Palestine.

Now Indirectly, yes, the Black September Organisation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_September_Organization) was a Palestinian Nationist Organisation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palestinian_nationalism), i.e. a movement of people who espouse self-determination and sovereignty over the region of Palestine. They were not a state sponsored group, nor were they duly elected representatives of the Palestinian people. They were entirely autonomous and operated without the input of Palestine.

Also here's an interesting point; Palestinian Nationalism formed in part in reaction to the 1967 Six Day War (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War), in which hostilities came to a head over Isreali expansion into sovereign Palestinian territory. So Isreal was already practicing colonial expansion, it was already engaging in hostilities sanctioned by the state. It was already killing people for land. Yes, that's right, they were already "bombing houses and killing families" as you put it.

The incident you mentioned is not the beginning of anything, nor the last part of something, it is one event in an enormous cascade of events that have led us here. Its only unique factor here is that you thought it was a clever way to derail the conversation and melodramatically clutch pearls.

So in conclusion, I said the Isreali State is committing atrocities, you admitted they practice apartheid and tried to justify it by citing the actions of a non-state affiliated terrorist group in 1972. A group who had support -much like the modern day terrorist groups who have the support of Palestinian people- in large part due to the illegal and unethical treatment of Palestine as a sovereign nation and Palestinians as an ethnic group.

As such my position has not changed, and you have done nothing but commit an unforced error while trying to justify apartheid. Palestinians today are desperate and have no hope they will be treated fairly by the powers that be, so they put their faith in manipulative groups who want to use their support to gain traction in their own ideological conflicts.

Yes, it's very shitty that Isreal and her allies have created such an unacceptable state of affairs, and Palestinians have been made so desperate they are willing to support anyone who promises to treat them better than we have. Great job shitting the bed and declaring your approval of Human Rights atrocities.

I think, in future, if you want to do Isreal a favor, you can best serve their interests by not talking. Opening your mouth here has only made their actions seem even less justifiable.

edit:several typos and a few clarifications