this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

144 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Feels like sin bins for tactical fouling is just creating even more problems rather than just up how often yellow cards are given for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

So give the ref's another tool to dictate the flow/outcome of games. What could go wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is class, would rather them do it for professinal and intentional fouls that dont quite equate to a red but a yellow is not enough

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Biggest issue with those fouls is that the rules currently only caution players if advantage isn't played.

So defenders can blatantly impede an attack and impact it heavily, but if attackers keep the ball and a free kick isn't given to there is no punishment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is that specific to professional fouls? Because referees are 100% allowed to return to a foul they played advantage on and give a card. I've never heard of the laws stating they cannot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Biggest issue I have with the sport is how binary a lot of the rules are despite how low scoring it is. Sending offs and penalties basically kill a lot of games but there is basically no middle ground to them really. Sin bins are a great start imo, next I would love more indirect free kicks in the box.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Let's try and ruin football even more

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The ten minute sin bin rule works great in rugby for yellows. I've thought for a long time it should be brought into football. Provided they mic up the refs and allow us to hear their deliberations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It works because there's not so much of an advantage, and it's a lot harder to get yellows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Also imagine VAR taking 5 minutes on each sin bin decision on top of what we have already

If they had a sin bin and somehow decided the way to implement it was "we will review every sin bin decision and then put the player in the bin" rather than "we will put players in the bin and then review the decision, inviting them to rejoin the game before their time in the bin is up if the binning was unjust" that would be insane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Gonna end up with a 3rd half of just stoppage time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Tactical fouls have had a huge negative effect on the product on the field. This rule makes them worse to commit so hopefully it limits them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's try and ruin football even more

God you all are so stuck on tradition. Change is ok. The sport isn't perfect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not sure about the sin bin thing before I hear more but one thing I think Football has needed for a long long time is allowing only the captain to approach the referee.

It's frustrating to watch when a foul or something happens and then you get half the pitch sprint over to the ref to try and influence him into making some kind of decision.

Having the ref's micced up so you can hear a conversation between them and the captain would make for good viewing whilst also improving the overall game I think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also the new trend of when a foul is given all the opposition players nonchalantly run over or next to the ball to stop a quick free kick. So frustrating. In rugby that free kick would be advanced 10 yards.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Advancing a free kick isn’t always beneficial in football though. It has been tried before.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not at all serious suggestion, loosely based on some NFL rules, where the non-penalised team can choose between two outcomes:

Let the other team choose whether to advance it 10 yard or give the player a 2 minute sin binning.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

100% agree. I'm at a point of just card anyone who yells at the ref. It's insane how much time is wasted just watching grown men bitch and someone to stand one foot from the ball until the ref makes them back up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Okay... what is the problem people have with sin bins (aka orange cards)?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

People think that removing a player for ten minutes is so mind-bogglingly complicated that we can't possibly make it work, despite grassroots officials doing it across england for the last three years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My problem is how easier than other sports it is to waste time in football.
Rugby? If you're down one man you need to bust your ass to pass time.

Football? Foul someone, get in front of the ball; spend a minute for a throw-in or a goal kick. Fake an injury.

Before introducing sin bins, I need these anti-football behaviours addressed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They can't enforce the rules already in place, are we to believe they could handle this whole new system? Call me a cynic but I don't have much faith.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

People live in this dream world where the rules of football never change.

From 1950-1990 the fundamental make up of the game changed absolutely loads. 2 points for a win, no penalty shootouts, pass backs, no red card for tackles from behind, offside if you're level.

Football isn't some holy doctrine that has always been like this so I have no idea why people are opposed to further positive change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuckin what? Bin VAR and stop all this nonsense. Let’s just go back to playing the game…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

VAR isn't the problem.

Poor use and badly constructed rules around its use is the problem

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

if we’re going to go full hockey we should let players fight too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think this would be horrendous, you'd just see the most negative time wasting anti-football as teams try to play out the period with reduced numbers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It’s not a bad idea in principle, but it’s just another way for officials to make inconsistent decisions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And without "net play time" it's gonna be even MORE inconsistent. Some players will lose like 2 minutes of actual game play, while other may lose 8/9...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

100% and another variable to bet on

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not really another way though is it? Or rather, or it's not adding more decisions to be made. Previously it was "Do I give this person a a yellow or nothing for saying that to me" and now it's "Do I give this person an orange or nothing for saying that to me".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

In that specific situation you almost feel like the hypothetical orange card for a sin bin could work like so:

  • orange, yellow = off
  • yellow, orange = sin bin
  • orange, orange = sin bin
  • and a third orange is always a red

This way referees who worry about being blamed for "ruining the game" with an early double yellow might punish players/teams where they'd otherwise find any excuse to avoid the second yellow.

This really would allow for more inconsistent decisions but it would facilitate punishing behaviours that ought to be punished but which routinely go unpunished.

The rules ("Laws" I know) keep getting written to be more objective, but the pursuit of objectivity is foolish when a lot of the decisions are always going to be subjective. Increasing the level of subjective discretion could actually make refs feel empowered to make calls they're otherwise hesitant to make because everything is so binary and clashes with the human element. Or it might not, but the situation now definitely needs fixing somehow... all that can go wrong is a different wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

And for VAR to fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Don’t copy Ruby , Ruby is rubbish

rather ice hockey , let the guys fight it out. Winner gets the free kick

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If they do this, they need to implement a mechanism whereby incorrect yellow cards can be rescinded.
Something along the lines of the tennis appeal system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

By adding another sanction other than a yellow card or red card I think it will just add to the shit show lead to even more inconsistencies and talking points around refereeing decisions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The key thing about sim binning is it SHOULD make it harder for a referee to fuck up.

This is because there’s a huge difference between a yellow card and a red card both in terms of what warrants one and also the consequences. The addition of a sim bin makes this difference smaller

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

More things for city to get away with. Things being at the referees discretion isn’t going to go well. Especially something like this

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Without changing the rules to net play time (e.g. two 30 min halves) this is gonna be a MESS.

The idea is fine, but when one team has a sin bin and they start wasting time and in the end the player is out for like 2 minutes of actual game play... while in other case a player is out for 10+ (or whatever it ends up being) people are gonna be mad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The VAR stuff yesterday, Sin Bins today. It's like an advent calendar of ways to ruin the most popular sport in the world. I'm looking forward to seeing what dogshit idea they'll give us tomorrow

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You should never be incentivised to break the rules in a game. Cynical fouls have been a plague for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is a good idea imo a yellow card for some of these tactical fouls isn’t enough

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sin bins were piloted in 2018-19 and led to the Football Association reporting a 38% total reduction in dissent across 31 leagues.

They were then introduced across all levels of grassroots football from the 2019-20 season in an attempt to to improve levels of respect and fair play.

The rule change was then implemented up to step five of the National League system and tier three and below in women's football.

This echoes my experience of them in grassroots 11 a side and sanctioned small sided football (in 5-7 a side they are two minutes).

I don’t see why they wouldn’t also work in professional football.

At grassroots level they have the big advantage of not having to deal with all the paperwork and admin of fining players.

One example I’ve seen them used quite well in is where you have a handbags at dawn type scenario with a bit of a melee and some pushing and shoving. A sin bin each for the two main antagonists tends to calm the game down without needing such drastic action as a red card.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Players will waste time like crazy until their teammate is out of the bin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If it’s just a trial then I don’t mind - curious to see what the result is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Pre-VAR I would have been all for this, but I can only see this lengthening the game even more and introducing another source of uncertainty and disagreement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This could work for dissent, but even then I'm not keen. A 10 minute spell on the sidelines is enough to ruin a game for something we're trying to define as less serious than a red card.

Imagine - a high stakes, UCL Semi Final, 88 minutes and it's level, end to end. A player loses it for a second under immense pressure, drops an f-bomb at the 4th official and is sin-binned. Their teammates stop playing and sit deep waiting for extra time. Game ruined, for what benefit?

load more comments
view more: next ›