this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
367 points (97.7% liked)

Games

32951 readers
576 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

FO4 was...okay imo. It pales in comparison to NV and 3 imo though.

[–] Deceptichum 3 points 9 months ago

As someone who couldn't tolerate F3/NV because they paled in comparison to 1/2, I actually really enjoyed 4. It lost a lot of the engine jank and felt like a decent FPS with light RPG mechanics, wearing the aesthetics of Fallout.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Imo, FO4 did everything better than FO3, except the plot. But FO3's plot was already kinda bland to begin with. I mean, back then... It was incredible. But not by today's standards.