this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
201 points (84.8% liked)

Games

31411 readers
1215 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Well, I mean, I would have launched it first (as an AAA game), but I'm no game developer. ๐Ÿคท And neither are they, from the looks of it. Good at perpetually raking in money for himself and his family, though!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Procedural recoil? So basically, random recoil you can never learn the patterns for?

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

I think so. Which is more realistic of course. But also a weird way to out "random recoil".

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Well, procedural when applied to generation of scenery/galaxies etc means to create the exact same thing using random values that are the same random for everyone. It just saves on storage.

But, I cannot tell you how this would apply to recoil. It would only make sense if there were an absolutely huge number of possible weapons.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nah, cause it could be a procedure like

  1. x is between 1 and 5
  2. recoil = Right*x + Up*4x

So you can learn to resist the average recoil