this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
1052 points (94.6% liked)
Technology
57432 readers
3325 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That’s a lot of new Linux computers.
I want to believe.
They could move to FreeBSD
Ain't nobody got time for dat
Just informing you that installing FreeBSD has been faster for me than installing Linux in most cases.
It's nice, just lacks drivers for some hardware. Lack of drivers doesn't mean more time spent, it just means the hardware is not working.
lol no, there's several very valid and pressing reasons linux's desktop marketshare is terrible.
lmao, what’s with the downvotes? I’ve tried to switch to linux twice, and have had nothing but issues. I love the idea, but I wish people would acknowledge that it still isn’t an easy switch for many.
It's just tired old linux elitism rearing its unwashed head again.
They can't stand it when their bad behavior is called out as part of linux's abysmal adoption rates, and they refuse to acknowledge the user hostility of the entire ecosystem.
Exactly this. IMO, Linux won’t become widespread until it’s truly easy to use. Despite how they shit on Windows, I could count on one hand how many times I’ve needed to look up an issue I couldn’t solve myself. The same can’t be said for when I tried Ubuntu, which I had more issues with before I could even get it installed.
Windows has gotten a lot better at fixing itself, but even back in the day when it didn't, I was confident I could find the solution to any problem in a forum somewhere.
With my attempts at linux, maybe 1 in 5 problems had an answer somewhere, and then it was still another 1 in 5 chance that the solution wold work with my distro.
So basically you copy-paste commands and expect them to work like some magic spells? I think I've estimated your level of expertise correctly in another comment.
No but I do fuckdamn expect a certain commonality between how repositories are handled which DOES NOT EXIST in the current ecosystem.
You always underestimated my expertise in each and every one of your comments.
JSYK if you live anywhere in the eastern half of the U.S. it is likely that your packets are going at least partway over a cable I laid with my own hands. You can estimate my expertise any way you want but my employer's satisfaction with my work outweighs some internet rando's opinion of a few hundred words.
Well, combining that and
that, then I agree that Red Hat and things based on it suck, but I don't see what does this have to do with "the current ecosystem", because different distributions handle repositories differently.
I'm sure you don't, which is why your shitty ass OS is sitting at 4% desktop adoption rates.
The issue is not with Linux not being easy to use. The issue is politics.
Most of the people use their PC for browsing. Throw Linux Mint or Ubuntu on the machine (that's the hard part for casual users), press firmware install if your wifi is not working (connect Ethernet cable), press update prompt. That's it.
You press on Firefox, you are on the Internet. THATS IT. I installed Mint on many old laptops. If you have problems, it's because you are tinkering around with your system. That's on you. Many casual users only use their browser.
I installed Mint and Ubuntu on many laptops. Elderly people I installed them for, never had any problems, even after me explicitly asking if they had any problems. Press power on, press Firefox, press power off.
Glad it works for you, but I have no interest in an OS which considers anything besides using a web browser “tinkering with my system”.
You have the ability to do anything with your system. That includes breaking it. That's the cost of freedom.
Rather the community expels assholes saying that everything should change because they like it different. People have differing tastes in general.
I've switched knowing literally nothing and people have mostly been friendly.
Except for Arch users, but there's not much sense in coming to their spaces - they are not only hostile, but also not very knowledgeable usually.
No they don't, they let them set up their own distro as an identity adornment.
That's nice, I've tried to switch at least nine times now as a seasoned IT admin that has built and administered to a minimum of 50+ linux servers and every time I look for solutions in the community I only get snide 'go read a manual before I deign to help you' comments.
The way you think of Arch users is the way I think of nearly all linux users.
Every time I see such an argument it means that the person using it probably overestimates their expertise. I tried to switch one time and switched. Knowing nothing.
I was 16 and I wasn't computer-savvy. It was 12 years ago, Linux users on the Web these days love to talk how easier it's become, in my opinion it's become harder, but that's off topic.
Or there may be necessities you can't fulfill with Linux, but that's not what you are claiming.
Give me a specific example. And of the tone of your question too - a community is not a drop-in replacement for paid support obviously, so if there was something of the "I need" kind, possibly with that "it's the OS' problem and not my hands" opinion in the package, those comments would be justified.
This is the exact arrogance I speak of.
If installing linux was just a 'skill issue', then why the fuck are you happy about only 4% desktop adoption rates?
And why the fuck is every forum post like this filled with replies like mine about how frustrating it is to get setup?
Shit son, I have still functioning keyboards older than you.
Ok, so I was trying to get a TWAIN emulator working to talk to my all-in-one printer, printing worked fine (after 3 days of tinkering with CUPS because my specific model didn't have an existing profile and fuck if I know about how to write one myself) but I needed the scanner and I asked in the forum for the particular emulator, I asked in several generic Ubuntu forums (the distro I was trying at the time).
The first reply was a just a link to the product's manual, which I had already read.
The next two replies were in the vein of 'How stupid of you to try and use TWAIN under linux, use a native device driver (again of which none existed for my device, which was clearly detailed in my original post)
The fourth reply can best be summed up as 'lol windows problems'.
And then the post was locked as a repeat topic and linked me back to some chucklefuck's 5 year old post about setting up a scanner with native linux drivers.
That is just one example of multiple dozens of issues I've tried at least to get directions towards a solution.
And not even the most frustrating one.
Because it's an uphill battle against monopolies. PCs mostly come with Windows preinstalled. Users mostly use the OS preinstalled. Considering that, 4% rate means that it's more usable than MacOS. Just repeating known truths.
Well, sometimes it is, and sometimes people expect something reality doesn't deliver.
Yellow card for ageism, ha-ha.
Oh, so a piece of hardware the vendor of which didn't care about Linux support. How is this an OS problem?
I obviously had that too, but I don't get why'd you be pissed at Linux and its community if it's a device driver problem.
OK, so that community we are talking about sometimes hallucinates when it comes to problems unsolvable. I had that with Windows too.
In your example the problem is with the vendor of the device.
Blah blah blah the same argument.
If you had a better product than Windows, for free, everyone would use it. You don't, and you blame everyone except yourselves.
Oh man am I having my first 'these fucking kids' moments? I think I am.
Because if I can't use my tools with one OS, but I can with another, then the problem is with the OS that I cannot. Scanners are common peripherals my dude. Do you think windows would have sold if it didn't support scanners?
I'm pissed at the linux community because their answers were antagonistic, elitist, and useless. You asked for one example, I gave you one example yet the community has responded in the same way each time.
Keep thinking that way and waiting for all vendors to start distributing their own linux drivers, see how far you get.
Yes, the same correct argument.
I've already guessed you think that, only you don't give any arguments supporting your opinion.
You've yourself said there's no official driver, so the entirety of the described problem is with the hardware vendor.
Windows doesn't even support browsers, because nobody ported Vimb to it, yet it sells.
That's how your opinion looks, some piece of hardware without a Linux driver (drivers for Windows are, of course, made by hardware vendors) not working is somehow Linux' fault.
I agree it's a Linux problem, but it's vendor's fault. Like if someone drops a turd on your head, it's their fault and your problem.
That last sentence made me laugh out loud and it's spot on. The amount of reverse engineering or getting drivers to work anyway that happens on Linux is already mind boggling.
If the vendor doesn't care, that's just what it is.
No it isn't, I refuted it in my next sentence.
I don't need to, simple market forces make that clear. If you have a free product that is easily available that outcompetes paid products, the market will shift to the free product. If it does not then it isn't outcompeting the competition.
Why would you pay for McDonald's if Smashburger was free?
How naive. Linux is the unsupported underdog here, and will not get more adoption by whining that vendors aren't making drivers for it. The only answer is to roll your own. I explicitly stated that this lack of hardware support is one of the things holding back linux from greater adoption, do you disagree with this? If you agree, then you know drivers must be written. If the manufacturer has no interest in doing it, then who will?
Are you fucking high? I really don't even know how to respond to this. I'm starting to think you are just copy pasting ChatGPT output.
Whining isn't going to raise your ridiculous OS's adoption rating, bro.
You have denied it, not refuted it.
You don't know shit about market forces either, and I'm ancap, LOL.
If a ride to get Smashburger costs more in time and money than McDonalds. Or if I have certain health problems and there's no diet Smashburger, but there's something in McDonalds. Or many other examples.
The first example looks especially fitting if, say, McDonalds got the building with some special municipal permission and Smashburger couldn't just buy something in similarly available place.
You if you need it. Nobody's going to do what you need for you. Adoption is not the only or the primary goal.
You can respond with thanking me on your knees for taking time to explain how you look and not asking if you are fucking high.
I'm not selling anything to you, bro.
Wow, you may want to take a class in rhetoric.
Wrong on the first part, and doesn't matter on the second. Market forces exist regardless of your economic religion.
OOOH YOU ARE SO FUCKING CLOSE! Not that you will ever admit it.
Now apply that to the time and energy that goes into standing up a linux desktop vs windows.
Then I won't be using linux now will I? AND HERE YOU SEE WHERE ELITISM GETS YOUR RIDICULOUS EXCUSE FOR AN OS.
Imagine if you got a phone, but before you could use the soft keyboard you had to write your own driver for it. HOW WELL DO YOU THINK THAT PHONE WOULD SELL?! How do you think people would treat it even if they got it for free?
Elitist shitbag proving my point at the speed of light.
Literally nothing you have written is meaningful or useful, I hereby banish you from my internet forever.
Such as?
I switched because Windows never works, it would take about a month after installation to get it into a stable state with wifi. But games would be laggy, task manager wouldn’t report accurate usage, and things would crash constantly
On Linux I just installed and it worked
That’s on top of being more user friendly for installation and use. Why are Windows commands so verbose? Why do you have to specify an install location instead of using the one you are in? Why is there no graphical package manager?
Like I get saying x doesn’t have a Linux version, but I don’t see Linux not working
Of the 4 main games I tend to play, the only one with Linux “support” is CS. That said, my frametimes were abysmal and the game was unplayable on Linux, even on the same system. I’m sure if I put the time in to get a perfect config it would be just fine, but I’m not spending hours of my time trying to get it working when Windows does the job just fine.
Weird, I’ve never experienced more work to get something working on Linux than Windows
No Nvidia for me.