politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Referring to political opposition of any sort as "insurgents", in a representative-style government, is both ridiculous and reprehensible. Stopped reading right there.
Which is annoying, because I agree with the headline argument. The underhanded rhetorical tactics are unacceptable, however.
Huh what is the issue? "Insurgent campaign" is a pretty common term of art in American politics for political campaigns that go against the establishment, it's not derogatory or anything.
See for example: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3291719
I was unaware of the broader trend and find it disturbing too. It's a poor choice of words. Fine for the tiny percentage of the population that is technically minded, but for the overwhelming majority, it will carry connotations that will have trickle-down effects across the broader electorate.
It subtly influences anyone who doesn't think about it very hard to view those campaigns unfavorably, given how the word insurgency is most closely associated with terrorism and warfare.
Things like this need to go through a science communication translation to avoid harming the public.