Technology

57453 readers

4164 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

315

Tidal’s subscription is getting simpler and cheaper — yes, you read that right (www.theverge.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

190 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's true, but at least half the artists I listen to I would never have found if it weren't for streaming. Something is, after all, better than nothing.

And compared to the competition, Tidal's payments are good:

~30% more than Apple Music (0.01c)

~300% more than Spotify (0.003 - 0.005c)

~500% more than Soundcloud (0.0025c)

~1000% more than Pandora (0.00133c)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sure, but even 300% of a tiny amount is still a tiny amount. People shouldn't be kidding themselves that Tidal pays artists well when the compensation is still significantly less than if you buy an artist's music directly.

The best approach is to use both - streaming for discovery and online stores for when you find an artists you really like and want to support them financially.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

If I had the money to pay for music twice I would 😅