this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
7 points (88.9% liked)

TechTakes

1430 readers
107 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sometimes what is not said is as sneerworthy as what is said.

It is quite telling to me that HN's regulars and throwaway accounts have absolutely nothing to say about the analysis of cultural patterns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Or maybe no one read the post because the title gave no information and just links to a wiki article

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

That's a real possibility. At risk of going NSFW, HN seems to have a very predictable reaction to links to (English) WP; their comments are always tangents based on personal experiences. For example:

But (at risk of invoking the shape-rotator stereotype) it seems like it's hard for HN's denizens to imagine a time when they personally were experiencing a memetic effect because memes are patterns rather than concretions. For analogy, an HN full of fish would not leave a single comment on the Fish WP article, ~~"Water."~~ Edit: A fairer example would be an article like "Properties of Water", because memetics is the study of memes, and memes are like water. ("Hydrodynamics" isn't a standalone article, but it would be another good candidate.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So try posting an article "Oxygen" with a link to the oxygen wikipedia article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Go for it! I don't have any active HN accounts and I don't want to make one.