this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
491 points (97.9% liked)

Memes

45377 readers
1730 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's funny that I never considered it, but why would they replace the low wage workers? Capitalism would care most about replacing the high wage workers (except for the CEO and other board members. They obviously are worth every penny and are irreplaceable with ai. ~signed CEO)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

because robots are still 10x cheaper than the low wage workers (in developed countries at least), and low wage worker jobs are usually easier to automate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The high earners' jobs are already mostly replaced by technology, but companies keep employing them and paying them anyway. They mostly schedule meetings.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

the issue if you don't employ the smart people, someone else will... and you don't want that typa competition, it is cheaper to just pay them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's important to not call executives workers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If companies made logical decisions, yes.