Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
Wrong. https://www.statsamerica.org/sip/rank_list.aspx?rank_label=pop1
1,132,812+1,095,962 +1,031,890+919,318+783,926 +733,406+678,972+647,464 +584,057
= 7,607,807
Tw510 is correct.
Wrong. He didnt say combined.
Its more than Tennessee, the 15th most populated state.
"Accounts for" in this context means combined.
Double fail
"Accounts for" does not mean combined.
The article does not use the term "accounts for"
Are you intentionally being stupid? Or is that a mistake too?
9 of the lowest populated states means the 7.6m of those states. That is very clearly the meaning going on here as that's what adds up.
The fact that you are so smooth brained to interpret it as anything else makes me amazed that you're even capable of using a computer or phone.
There is no universe in which thats what he meant.
And smooth brained? Couldnt come up with an original insult? You make the Lion King look original.
Couldnt come up with an original insult? You make the Lion King look original.