this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
144 points (75.7% liked)

Memes

46724 readers
864 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 101 points 11 months ago (4 children)

OP probably assumes it's impossible that a black person might have been born in Scotland in 1820 despite the Atlantic slave trade being in full swing for centuries by that point making this entirely feasible.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Feasible? Sure. Pick 2 people randomly during that time? Unlikely. I have nothing against diversity. And I have nothing against an AI being encouraged to produce diverse outputs. I do think it's a clear indicator of the internal prompts that guide the AIs choices.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, sure. But it's not like that's the only bias. What are the chances it was going to pick two attractive, seemingly well to do people and not two plain farmers or shepherds or something like that? Or people of very different ages or different heights, etc.

It's not choosing entirey randomly but it isn't showing us anything that couldn't have possibly existed.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Shrek is love Shrek is life

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

It's not choosing entirey randomly but it isn't showing us anything that couldn't have possibly existed.

No it's showing us anything the creators of the AI want us to see. It won't generate ugly people because the creators used much more attractive people to train the AI. Also, you won't see what your typical Scot looked like in the 1820s, because the creators made the AI change the prompt to add diversity.

[–] winterayars -1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The prompt wasn't to generate two equally statistically likely people or something. It was: show me two people. The AI did just that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Random is implicit in that statement.

[–] winterayars 1 points 11 months ago

I don't think that's true. The prompt was "images of people" and that is what was delivered. The AI generated something to meet the prompt. That's all.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The AI did that. Because of a guided output.

[–] winterayars 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does "guided output" mean in this context?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You guide the output to influence it.
Like making it "diverse" (include a black person), a person being attractive and free of blemishes unless instructed, a person being a specific age like 20-30 unless instructed.

That are just a few examples what I meant.

[–] winterayars -1 points 11 months ago

That does not appear to be what's happening in that image.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 11 months ago

In 1778, Court of Session judges ruled that slavery was incompatible with Scots Law. This ruling meant Knight could not be made to carry out tasks for Wedderburn or be taken back to Jamaica against his will.

Awesome. Knight is a hero.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

OP would have to be pretty stupid if that's the case.

It looks like they made their account just to post this. They made an account just to tell others they're a moron.

Damn

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

Apparently the National Library of Scotland has caved to the woke liberal agenda of acknowledging that black people exist and your post deserves to be downvoted!