this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
397 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

62936 readers
3391 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
397
Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
158 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin::US government tracking the energy implications of booming bitcoin mining in US.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fruitycoder 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly eth just made more progress between built in smart contracts and proof of stake, I'm surprised Bitcoin is still holding on. Sunk cost fallacy I guess.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not an economist or anything, but I don't think it's a sunk cost fallacy I think it's just a market. They're all mining both. Just leaning heavier on whichever one makes them more money in the moment. The market is going to have a hell of a lot of inertia.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The market is run by people, and people have been proven not to be rational. So, sunk cost easily applies to the market

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Come on, that's logic 101

All a are b

some b are c

all a are not c.

You can't even claim that most A are C with that logic

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't quite follow you beyond the fact that in your example "all A are not C" is correct

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think that's our major problem here.

[–] fruitycoder 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a good point a lot of the crypto markets influence is still more focused as an investment vehicle for getting more fiat wealth, that's more reasonable to me. I guess I am just a die hard engineer and the practical uses matters a lot more than the price of tulips.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I mean honestly you're right. Nobody should be left on the Bitcoin side from an environmental or a cost standpoint. But I have no idea how long it's going to take to catch up.

I will say that at some point if there is an awakening, bitcoin's going to crash so f****** hard. And the first ones out are going to make all the money.