I can’t help but think that cars (EV included) just aren’t the answer. I feel like bikes aren’t the answer either. I feel like the metro and high speed rail are.
Most people don’t drive because they like driving (US), most people drive because they have to. And that sucks. You shouldn’t feel like you’re forced to drive. Because that’s auto insurance and auto registration that you have to pay.
You can’t eliminate roads altogether. You need at least one or two lanes for fire trucks, ambulances, garbage trucks, etc. but you can create pockets of no car zones.
People like me who like cars, should be able to have places we store our cars. We should have places where we can explore the limits of our cars instead of driving through traffic. But that should be a strictly extracurricular activity.
In the no car pockets, you should be able to walk to a grocery store, hardware store, that has what you need. You should be able to have mixed zoning. Single family units shouldn’t be the norm. If I own a car but it’s not my dedicated form of transportation, I can buy a cooler car and I don’t need a garage next to where I live to store it. I can store it outside no car pockets so that I can take public transport to my car and then take my car to the track.
Yes, it’ll take awhile to get there but why aren’t we doing more to that end? Am I too idealistic?
Ah, no true Scotsman it is, then.
So no public transit counts unless it's Manhattan or Japanese? Have you driven in Manhattan? A pogo stick would be faster than driving.
The USA is the country that needs public transit the most. We have 9 cars for every 10 people, and 300 million cars on the road. China has more cars, but only 2.2 cars per 10 people. No other country has more than 100 million cars, and no country with more than 100,000 cars has more cars per capita.
So when we're talking about replacing cars, you cannot simply ignore the entire USA because we haven't developed as much infrastructure as Manhattan.
We want to replace cars AND build actual good infrastructure. The current system heavily favors cars so of course they're more convenient in some ways. In a more balanced and sustainable system the advantages cars have would significantly decrease.
Where did you get the impression that I was talking about "replacing" cars? I said we should replace the urban design approach itself to one which prioritizes walkability over cars. Driving a car rarely be the most practical way of getting from point A to B, but unfortunately it is in most of North America.
What I was responding to was your suggestions that no amount of transit infrastructure or walkability can be good enough to make it so people don't still need a car, and that car travel is inherently more efficient for getting around.