Technology

58011 readers

4439 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

397

Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin (arstechnica.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

158 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Over 2 percent of the US’s electricity generation now goes to bitcoin::US government tracking the energy implications of booming bitcoin mining in US.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I think bitcoin is a waste of electricity. Never got the hype around something that takes so much energy, but doesn’t even even actually exist to make it worth it. Disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Anything is only worth what someone will pay. Always. Nothing has value beyond that.

[+] [email protected] -7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Can I know why so many people disliked this? Did I said something that is not factually correct?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

PoS inevitably leads to centralization and requires an inflationary currency supply. That is the problem. Coins in transit can't stake. Which means the only coins that can stake are coins that already exist and are sitting on a staking node. You are paying those stakers with an inflationary supply. Which means you are minting new coins and handing them to users who already have the most coins. This leads to centralization of the supply over time, and therefore, control of network consensus. A few rich, powerful people end up controlling the whole system, just like our existing banking system. No thanks.

Most of those PoS chains also have massive chain sizes/system requirements compared to Bitcoin, which means they can't be or remain nearly as decentralized, neutral, and secure.