this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
489 points (95.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53370 readers
837 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

this contradiction always confused me. either way the official company is "losing a sale" and not getting the money, right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 178 points 6 months ago (35 children)

In theory, sharing a digital file can have a much greater impact than sharing a CD physically. Plus, you lose access to your copy of the CD if you give it to someone else. You can think of it like transferring a license for one user to a different user. There is no simultaneous usage.

I don't personally agree with this view, but I believe that's the argument.

[–] [email protected] 114 points 6 months ago (24 children)

I buy disc.

I rip contents of CD to computer.

I sell disc.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (8 children)

The amount of people who will duplicate their tapes and CDs would be lower than the amount of people who will duplicate their digital files.

Most of the time when a law sounds silly for banning something when alternatives exist, it's because people themselves are silly and don't actually go for the alternatives at the same rate as they would the banned thing. Ie gun accessory bans, ninja star bans.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Where were you in the early 2000s? Lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know anyone who didn’t do this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Anecdotal evidence isn't evidence.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Anecdotal evidence is literally evidence of one (which disproves "zero" claims). Collections of anecdotal evidences make statistics making your dismissive statement dumb.

I'm adding to the pile. I can name literally over a dozen people in my childhood who copied Discs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Start naming. Organize the names. And their experiences, and start collecting over time, if you wanna go that route. Because otherwise, you're just some random words in the ether.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

We are... you have 3 in front of you. Out of the probably 300-400 people who've looked at this thread you've seen 3 people answer affirmatively. You're watching it happen in real time!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Burning CDs. That's how I know most people didn't know how to do it, or want to put in the effort. You had to go buy a stack of CDs, hope your computer supported burning, had to make sure players could support the burned disc (depending on if you made a music disc or data disc, if it was rewritable), and spend the time to burn the disc.

Contrast that to ctrl+c ctrl+v.

There's more people who can 'duplicate' digital files than there were people burning CDs.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (30 replies)