this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
381 points (95.5% liked)

Games

31430 readers
1588 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This would be a huge precedent for video-game preservation. IANAL but this would mean one of these two:

  • service cannot be shut down without release of server source code
  • whole game need to be reclassified as software service

Seems like the latter would be an easy loophole tbh.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Also NAL, but it seems like they aren't arguing for server functionality but rather just the ability to play offline at all, which opens up the third option of requiring games to be patched to remove sever requirements if being shut down, in any case this will be a fascinating case to follow, and I hope they go through with the lawsuit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

True though that's a bit of a potato/potatoh probpem as the easiest way to patch-in offline would be to run server locally rather than have 2 different architectures of offline and online plays. That's already how many games work today actually - singleplayer is just a server with only you on it.