this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
321 points (93.7% liked)

Linux

46775 readers
1731 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've always felt guilty by taking for granted the rare breed of virtuous humans that provide free excellent software without relying on advertising. Let's change that and pay, how much would I “lose” anyway?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ReveredOxygen 23 points 7 months ago (5 children)

AWS isn't charging for the software, they're charging to let you run stuff on their hardware

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If that were solely true, there would be a lot more competition in the field right now. Amazon, (and to a much lesser extent the other 2 big names, GCP and Azure) are so massive not because they have a lot of power (plenty of other companies like digital ocean or OVM have plenty of scaling power too)— but because the integrations between their products are so seamless. Most of that functionality has a foundation in FOSS software that they’ve built on top of.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Yeah the software being bundled in default images is just a convenience.

Most places that are serious about using AWS will be shipping their own images anyway

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Which, by itself, is fine. But their contributions to open source are very one-handed and pale in comparison to how much they benefit out of it.

Hell, my company is no different. They allocate one day out of the year as "open source day" where devs can contribute back to open source projects on company time. But it must be something we already use.

No personal development. No non-essential libraries.

We make literally millions off of these libraries and we don't even contribute monetarily.

If these companies gave even 0.01% of their revenue to these essential libraries, they'd never even have to ask for money.

[–] UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT 3 points 7 months ago

I think their point (may be wrong) is that none of this high powered software would exist without the goodness of strangers. Tbf it probably wouldn't look like this without business / on the clock contributing either