this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
125 points (84.5% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3824 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Commentary: Longtime former Republican on Patrick Deneen and the demise of the conservative intellectual

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (73 children)

This is incorrect.

There is a such thing as a "conservative intellectual". It's just that they've been long since drowned out by the rest of the party, and the right-wing voting base has no appetite for actual, sensible conservative policies right now.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (57 children)

Name one conservative policy that has furthered mankind. Prohibition, voting rights, sexuality, drug war, terrorism; time after time they’ve been wrong. Even fiscally they run up the deficit. Their only role is to preserve hierarchy and maintain power

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Progressivism is moving towards collective goals. Conservatism is protecting individual freedoms.

You many see individual freedoms differently than they do but that is the core fundamental policy they protect.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But they don't protect individual freedoms.

They have taken a hard stance against body autonomy, free speech, individual identity - all in support of corporate and state control over the individual.

This is the same argument as saying conservatives are fiscally responsible. It's just something people say with nothing historically supporting it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Neo-conservatism is what you are referring to and yes they are doing those things.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you're saying is true in theory, but the American Republican party has absolutely nothing in common with it.

Just look at the patriot act, torture, detention, TSA, and all the other shit pushed through by the GOP that has decimated freedoms and privacy.

The ONLY individual freedom the GOP protects unconditionally is for everyone and their uncle to own guns. Nevermind if your uncle is a lunatic, they'll protect his freedom to be armed to the teeth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The republican party isn't conservative. They are neo-conservative. Different problem.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Everyone living depends on huge networks of interdependent actors for basic survival. Never mind quality of life. The political reality of the individual is that they are the smallest and weakest political unit; least equipped to petition for change.

Conservatism may have individualism all over the label, but conformity is what's inside the box.

load more comments (53 replies)
load more comments (68 replies)