this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

todayilearned

1173 readers
1 users here now

See [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
55
Ballistics evidence not reliable nor based on science, Maryland Supreme Court says (www.wusa9.com)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

"There was a study called Ames 2, and what that study found that when they tried to reproduce the opinions of one examiner versus another examiner, they found that over 50% of the time, the second examiner came to a different conclusion on the same evidence than the first examiner," Gilleran explained.

Yeah, that's pretty damning.