Technology

57453 readers

4884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

653

Ubisoft Exec Says Gamers Need to Get 'Comfortable' Not Owning Their Games for Subscriptions to Take Off (www.ign.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

222 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ubisoft Exec Says Gamers Need to Get 'Comfortable' Not Owning Their Games for Subscriptions to Take Off::An executive at Assassin’s Creed maker Ubisoft has said gamers will need to get “comfortable” not owning their games before video game subscriptions truly take off.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 187 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Remember kids, if buying isn't owning, piracy isn't theft.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

I like this guy!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

And if corporations decide they can charge a fee when we DON'T play, then we can decide to NOT pay when we play! The only way to make them feel their greed is to wave the ol' Jolly Roger!

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I’ve seen this saying going around and while I do like it, something about it bugs me. These corpos want to treat everything as a service. If you acquire content from a service via illegal means you are indeed still stealing, no?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

You're either selling a service or a product, you don't get to lay claim to both, and you don't get to walk with peoples money by using linguistic tricks

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What content are you acquiring from their service if you get it somewhere else? If what they're selling is service, not content, then getting the content elsewhere doesn't affect them, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I just want to start off by saying Arrrr, I’m on your side.

But I just don’t follow the logic. Netflix is selling both service and content. When people pay for Netflix… yes they pay for infrastructure related to streaming content. They also pay toward the cost of producing original content and acquiring licenses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

No: I didn't take it from them since they never owned my copy. The Supreme Court said piracy isn't stealing. The corporations lose NOTHING through piracy.