Technology

58011 readers

3076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

193

Supreme Court declines to hear Apple-Epic antitrust case, meaning developers can point customers to the web (techcrunch.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Apple’s customers bought their iPhone knowing alternative stores are not available.

Your perspective seems to be to ignore the very existence of anti trust rules that stand for the proposition that even if the customer knows what they're getting in a free market capitalist transaction it can be illegal.

Can't your justification of Apple be used for every anti trust case? "AT&T’s customers bought their service knowing alternative rotary dial telephones manufactured by 3rd parties are not available."

[–] [email protected] -3 points 7 months ago

I'm not an antitrust lawyer, but I suspect the fact that Android exists makes iPhone not a monopoly.

AT&T owned the phone lines and the equipment, leading to that problem. So if Apple went and bought all of the cell service providers and said "You're only allowed to use iPhones" that would be similar, and they would probably cease to exist relatively quickly.