this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1098 points (98.7% liked)

People Twitter

5398 readers
878 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1098
Layoff season (lemy.lol)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/whitepeopletwitter
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 99 points 11 months ago (19 children)

Da fuck is layoff season? Is that a real thing?

[–] winterayars 19 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It is 100% a real thing. American tech companies go through this cycle where they over-hire (on purpose) and then later on they lay a bunch of people off to "cut costs" and appear "financially responsible". This is also easier to manage (if you're a lazy dipshit) because you don't need to worry about your exact headcount so much, you can adjust later if you have too many or too few people. (It also gives a good excuse to get rid of people you don't like but who would otherwise be very hard to fire.)

Investors eat that shit up.

Since companies tend to report earnings and things around the same time, companies engaging in this strategy all tend to lay people off at the same time.

Here's a page tracking this phenomenon.

[–] labsin 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is unthinkable in the EU. If a company isn't sure about the needed force, they need to hire temps.

If you don't have a technical or economical reason, you are not even allowed to lay off an employee.

And you have to give notice for a period, which is proportional to the time you worked for the company, or you have to pay this fully as severance and this can be more than a year.

Protected employees (voted as union representatives) are even harder to fire.

This does come with the downside that some, almost not productive, colleagues never get fired. But I guess it beats the alternative of having almost no protection.

[–] winterayars 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The US companies claim they have economic reasons but really this is just part of a cycle that shareholders understand but companies hope employees will not.

They claim they're fixing problems by firing people, but for the most part these are companies that are more profitable than ever.

There's much less worker protection in the US, though. A lot of these companies have EU branches and I bet those EU branches are mostly left alone during these layoffs for that reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)