this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
781 points (96.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20688 readers
1191 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MaliciousKebab 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Adobe products: Hello there!

[–] 0x4E4F 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, you can run them with some heavy modding. I've done it with Photoshop 2021 and Premiere 2021. Takes a lot of work and debugging, but it's doable.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

That's a solid no for me and most people. I'm working on getting my office above 50% Linux but I'll probably never get to 100%.

[–] 0x4E4F 4 points 8 months ago

Well 50% is good, not bad at all 👍.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Probably an idea as old as time but wouldn’t it work to stream adobe products from a terminal server?

Let me elaborate: two major fronts I’ve seen are “I type data and write emails” types that can easily work on the terminal and “I make heave graphics and video editing and cant work without 4090 gpu” which we usually just leave to it.

Obviously there are more nuances but most should be doable in terminal unless no internet or very bad internet. I’m somewhat hopeful this would work. Everyone has a very efficient linux pc/laptop and the heavy lifting is done by windows vms with adobe suite running on shared A100s. And while they are not used they could be rented out for extra cost efficiency.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Possible, not practical.

I use substance painter and I need it to work. I don't want to spend hours messing around trying to make it work and jumping through hoops.

Wine for DCC is great if you enjoy tinkering with pipelines rather than using them, but impractical for people who are trying to reliably get work done.

[–] 0x4E4F 1 points 8 months ago

Possible, not practical.

Yes, true to be honest.