this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
24 points (92.9% liked)

Canada

7224 readers
335 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Are instances of fediverse platforms going to be affected by this law? Does it apply at all to the fediverse?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (9 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Canada's new bill forces companies who shares a link to a Canadian news outlet to pay the outlet called a "link tax". Google doesn't want to pay the "link tax" so they got rid of every search result to Canadian news outlet in response. This effectively ensures nobody can see the news from Canadian news outlets through Google.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My understanding is that Canadian news outlets are already suffering specifically because of Google. Wouldn't keeping the status quo also be causing harm to these outlets?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Hedge funds are the problem - look who owns the owners of Canadian newspapers and you'll see why newspapers are suffering. Shareholders want to see cash flow and if you can't get it selling subscriptions and classifieds, or getting a bailout to not cut staff or close papers, then you convince your buddies to pass a law forcing some other rich company to give you some of their cash flow. Google and FB are the current evil-du-jour so they pin this one on them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)