this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
-17 points (18.5% liked)

Conservative

481 readers
166 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"I want people to die in the streets, hungry, broke, and suffering"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Republicanism is about hurting the, "right people." In this case, trans people and the non-wealthy infirmed. Who cares if it costs us more for worse outcomes for everyone?

[–] OnlyTakesLs 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why transpeople specifically, and not just non-wealthy people in general?

(A complete side thing, isn't 'infirmed' an old time slur for disabled people?)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why transpeople specifically

There is a major push on the right to deny trans people rights and medical care. This article was intended to create outrage among them, as it relates to two groups who are popular to vilify: trans people and illegal immigrants, with an implication of wasteful spending as well. Rather than focusing on the benefits of public health care for most people, it singles out minority groups who the author implies are unworthy of receiving it.

isn’t ‘infirmed’ an old time slur for disabled people?

My understanding was that infirmed just means people who are ill, however looking it up just now it evidently has implications of being feeble/weak/elderly that I did not intend.

[–] OnlyTakesLs -1 points 1 year ago

Trans people have the same rights as everyone else, but I understand that the perception is different. And for the record, illegal immigrants are villians.

As for infirmed, yeah, Ive been caught out a couple times too, it happens. No single person can know everything.