this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
166 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] albert69stein 8 points 1 year ago (10 children)

It's really good. So called "dynamic contracts" with hourly pricing known only a day in advance are on the rise. Lots of people whithout access to solar can still benefit strongly this way by timing useage of things like washer/dryers etc. Lots of these devices are also becoming "smart" now to automatically pick a good pricing window.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Funny, how even this, which was an often cited use case for smart contracts of more sophisticated blockchain token like Ether, is totally not dependent on any blockchain.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I have yet to see anything legal which actually benefits from a blockchain (and isn't about the blockchain stuff itself, like trading crypto currencies).

[โ€“] albert69stein 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been working with a company that uses a very common blockchain to timestamp documents/artwork/data etc.

It's a niche use case but it simply couldn't be done before the existance of blockchains.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate why a blockchain is beneficial here? The use case "timestamp documents/artwork/data" does not call for a blockchain to me.

[โ€“] albert69stein 3 points 1 year ago

Previously this timestamping was accredited by notaries. This had the problems of cost and the trust in a notary did not translate well internationally.

Now it is almost free to do and the cost of manipulating a blockchain (if possible at all) far outweighs the potential gain from malice.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)